The Amasaman High Court has reduced the jail term of Nana Agradaa, also known as Patricia Asiedua or Evangelist Patricia Oduro, from 15 years to one year.
[WATCH] Nana Agradaa 15-Year Jail Slashed to 1 Year – Ghana’s Trending Court Update
The ruling follows a judicial review which found that the original sentence imposed on the controversial religious figure was harsh and excessive. The decision has sparked widespread public discussion, given Nana Agradaa’s high-profile status and the intense interest surrounding her legal troubles.
Judge Rules 15-Year Sentence Excessive
In delivering the ruling, the court held that while Nana Agradaa was duly convicted, the punishment handed down earlier did not appropriately reflect the circumstances of the case. The judge emphasized that sentencing must remain proportionate and aligned with established legal principles.
As a result, the court substituted the original sentence with a revised 12-month custodial term, significantly reducing the length of imprisonment.
According to court documents, the new one-year sentence is set to take effect from July 3, 2025. This adjustment means Nana Agradaa will serve a substantially shorter period behind bars than initially ordered.
Legal experts say the backdated application of the sentence is consistent with Ghanaian sentencing practices following appellate or review decisions.
Public Reaction to Nana Agradaa Court Ruling
The reduction of Nana Agradaa’s jail term has triggered mixed reactions across social media and public discourse. While some observers believe the court acted fairly in correcting an excessive punishment, others argue the initial sentence served as a strong deterrent against fraudulent religious practices.
The case continues to fuel debate about justice, proportional sentencing, and accountability in Ghana’s legal system.
Background to Nana Agradaa’s Legal Troubles
Nana Agradaa rose to national prominence following her transition from traditional spiritual practices to evangelical ministry. However, her activities later attracted legal scrutiny, culminating in her conviction and sentencing.
The case has since become one of Ghana’s most talked-about legal sagas involving a religious personality.
Implications for Ghana’s Justice System
Legal analysts say the ruling by the Amasaman High Court underscores the judiciary’s willingness to reassess sentences where necessary to uphold fairness. The decision may also influence how similar cases are handled in the future.
For more similar updates read our coverage on Celebrity Gossip
