In a surprising admission during his campaign speech in January 2026, Dr. Bryan Acheampong, a prominent aspirant for the New Patriotic Party (NPP) presidency, disclosed that he had been providing financial assistance to party members of parliament.
Specifically, he revealed personally funding 62 NPP MPs with a monthly stipend starting from 2021. This support continued until the party’s defeat in the 2024 general elections, highlighting his commitment to bolstering the NPP’s internal structure during a critical period.
The payments amounted to GH¢20,000 per MP each month, resulting in a substantial total expenditure. Over the course of 48 months, this initiative cost approximately GH¢59.8 million, drawn from Acheampong’s personal resources. As a key figure in Ghanaian politics and agriculture, Acheampong positioned this as a gesture of loyalty to the party, aimed at ensuring MPs could focus on their duties without financial distractions.
However, this disclosure has sparked widespread debate regarding its legality. Under Article 71 of Ghana’s Constitution, MPs’ salaries and allowances are mandated to come exclusively from the Consolidated Fund. Any external supplementation could raise questions about compliance with these regulations, potentially opening the door to investigations by relevant authorities.
Bryan Acheampong Discloses Monthly Payments to NPP MPs Amid Ghana Election Fallout [X Post]
“I paid 62 NPP MPs GH¢20,000 every month when we were in power, amounting to GH¢1.24 million monthly since 2021” — NPP flagbearer aspirant, Dr. Bryan Acheampongpic.twitter.com/ye9DqSFv9g
— GhanaTrends.com (@GhanaTrendsInc) January 19, 2026
Public reaction on social media has been swift and intense, with many Ghanaians expressing outrage over what they perceive as misuse of funds. Critics argue that such large sums could have been redirected toward national priorities, such as education or healthcare. For instance, calculations circulating online suggest that the total amount could have sponsored the medical training of numerous students, underscoring the opportunity costs involved.
Acheampong’s statement, captured in a news graphic by GHOne TV, has fueled discussions on political financing in Ghana. Supporters view it as evidence of his dedication to the NPP, while opponents see it as an attempt to buy influence within the party ranks ahead of leadership contests.
The timing of this revelation comes as the NPP grapples with its 2024 election loss, prompting internal reflections on strategy and unity. Acheampong’s financial role may influence his standing among party members, but it also invites scrutiny from anti-corruption watchdogs and the public at large.
As Ghana’s political landscape evolves, this episode serves as a reminder of the blurred lines between personal patronage and official party support. For more insights on recent political developments, check out our coverage on [Ghana Elections 2024](/ghana-elections-2024).
