John Dramani Mahama, the flagbearer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), has voiced criticism against President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo’s approach to the anti-LGBTQ bill, urging him to seek counsel from the Council of State.
Mr. Mahama denounces President Akufo-Addo’s decision to withhold assent to the bill, characterizing it as undemocratic and misguided. Speaking at a gathering with members of the clergy and imams in Nelerigu, North East Region, Mr. Mahama underscores the importance of the Council of State’s intervention in the matter.
Addressing concerns regarding President Akufo-Addo’s stance on the anti-LGBTQ bill, Mr. Mahama emphasizes the need for democratic principles and consultation with key advisory bodies like the Council of State. He asserts that the president’s decision not to sign the bill fails to reflect the will of the Ghanaian people and disregards the concerns expressed by various religious and societal groups. By urging the Council of State to intervene, Mr. Mahama advocates for a collaborative approach to address the contentious issue.
As the debate surrounding the anti-LGBTQ bill intensifies, Mr. Mahama’s remarks highlight the divergent viewpoints within Ghanaian society and the importance of inclusive decision-making processes. With calls for greater dialogue and consultation, stakeholders await further developments in this ongoing discourse, recognizing the significance of upholding democratic values and respecting diverse perspectives.
Remarks Made by John Mahama Asking Akufo-Addo to Seek Advice from Council of State on Anti-Gay Bill
The president can refer the bill to the Council of State and say that look, I have received this bill from Parliament and I want you to take a look at it and advise me about this bill. And so the Council of State will look at it and then they will write their advice to the president and then the president will take that advice and based on that either sign it or if Council of State raises legitimate issues, the president will send it back to Parliament with the issues that were raised by the Council of State. That is what the Constitution says. But the Constitution also says that Parliament shall present the bill to the President. It is a constitutional action. And the fact that somebody has filed an interlocutory motion in the Supreme Court does not stop the Parliament from presenting the bill. Mr. Mahama remarked.
